Giving 'em the bizniz since 2006

Thursday, July 1, 2010

The Bizniz, Volume 2, Issue 5 ARCHIVE

4/25/06

Please allow me to belatedly throw down an NBA Playoff Preview. As you'll see from some of my picks, I'm no front-runner, either.

Western Conference

I like the Mavs over the Warriors. Despite taking all three match ups this year, I think Golden State is overmatched by the best team in the league, Dallas (Shout to two of my favorite players, though-Baron Davis and Jason Richardson.) I like Phoenix over L.A. Kobe is MONEY but the Suns are too good (Amare was out last year.) Spurs over the Nuggets. Love the Melo/A.I. combo, but the Spurs are still as dangerous as any squad and well-freaking coached. The 4/5 is usually the best match up. I like the Jazz over the Rockets. Again, love the two man combo of T-Mac and Yao, but Utah's 1-5 can run with anybody in basketball. Deron Williams is a top-5 NBA point.

I like the Mavs over the Jazz in round 2. Dirk and Co. are on a mission. Phoenix over San Antonio in a tightly contested, helter-skelter series. Too much firepower (and depth, for once.)

I'm a Suns dude through and through, but Dallas is too good, too experienced, and too pissed from last year. My heart says Suns, and my head almost does, too. Mavs in 7.

Eastern Conference

Pistons over the still-a-year or two-away Magic. LeBron and the Cavs over the Agent Zero-less Wizards. I'll go with popular sentiment and say New Jersey, and their three headed monster of Kid/Carter/Jefferson, over the very green Raptors. And I like the Heat to…well…get hot and beat a really good Bulls team.

Detroit is great but it always seems like they're missing something. I'd pick Miami in an upset if D. Wade was 100%. Alas, he isn't, so the Pistons stumble through and win the series. Cavs/Nets would make for some great television. Jersey is experienced and talented and the Cavs are a little thin. I love LeBron but I'll say he gets cold; the Nets get hot, and take the series.

I like the Pistons, who finally realize their potential, to defeat the upstart Nets. Well-coached and loaded, Detroit puts it together.

NBA Finals

Mavs v. Pistons

Yeah, it's kind of lame to pick both #1 seeds but hey, sue me. The best team in each conference makes it through, though not without being tested. Obviously, the West is head and shoulders above the East. But we all said that last year, too. I picked Dallas last year and they let me down. I'm picking Dallas again this year. To quote our great President, George W. Bush: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice….we won't be fooled again." Dirk Nowitzki leads the Mavs to the crown. It's déjà vu all over again.

Award Winners

The only real question is MVP. Is it Steve Nash or is it Dirk Nowitzki? That's been the query all year. Dirk is the best player on the best team. Dirk went for a Dirk-like 25 and 9 boards. Dude's super-nice, no doubt about it. A silky 7 footer who can fill it up anywhere. Pretty rare. Steve Nash did 19 and 12 dimes per, leading the top offense in basketball. Dirk is certainly indispensable. I still think Nash makes everything run for the Suns. Because he runs the point and makes everyone better directly, he's still the most valuable player in my mind. I think Nowitzki will win it, and you really can't complain. But 3 in a row for a little white Canadian would be pretty cool.

Quote of the Week:

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds."
-- Albert Einstein

The Bizniz, Volume 2, Issue 4 ARCHIVE

4/5/06

I love baseball. So with Major League Baseball in full swing (mad puns!!!) I am feeling great. Here's my full MLB 2007 Preview.

American League (with predicted order of finish)

East: Boston, New York, Toronto, Baltimore, Tampa Bay

Central: Detroit, Chicago, Minnesota, Cleveland, Kansas City

West: Anaheim, Oakland, Seattle, Texas

Division Winners: Boston (100-62), Detroit (89-73), Anaheim (93-69)

Wild Card: New York (98-64)

Major Award Winners: MVP-Alex Rodriguez, other candidates-David Ortiz, Gary Sheffield, Vlad Guererro. Cy Young-Justin Verlander, other candidates Johan Santana, Josh Beckett, Mariano Rivera

National League

East: New York, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Florida, Washington

Central: St. Louis, Chicago, Houston, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh

West: Los Angeles, San Diego, Arizona, San Francisco, Colorado

Division Winners: New York (95-67), St. Louis (90-72),

Los Angeles (94-68) Wild Card: Atlanta (89-73)

Major Award Winners: MVP-Albert Pujols, other candidates David Wright, Ryan Howard, Andruw Jones. Cy Young-Brandon Webb, other candidates Carlos Zambrano, John Smoltz, Jason Schmidt

Playoff Predictions:

ALDS-Boston over Detroit, New York over Anaheim ALCS-Boston over New York

NLDS-St. Louis over New York, Los Angeles over Atlanta NLCS-L.A. over St. Louis

World Series

Red Sox over Dodgers

On a separate note, I want to comment on the University of Kentucky men's basketball program. Billy Donovan, fresh off back-to-back national championships with Florida, ended the speculation today as to whether or not he'd leave the Gators to coach at Kentucky. Most pundits are saying that Kentucky is the holy grail of college coaching jobs, if not coaching jobs in general. They say Florida is a football school, that Florida is a football state. Kentucky has so much tradition! Let me say here in no uncertain terms my opinion: FLORIDA IS A BETTER BASKETBALL COACHING JOB THAN KENTUCKY. Kentucky is a solid program. But if you don't win 30 games and make the Final Four every year you're on the hot seat; ask Tubby Smith. Florida has all the resources, facilities, and attractiveness of any college program. In fact, as a college kid, where would you rather spend your college years: Lexington, KY or Gainesville, FL? Kentucky is no longer the best job out there. For Billy Donovan's sake, I'm glad he decided not to transfer laterally, if not down, by going to UK.

The Bizniz, Volume 2, Issue 3 ARCHIVE

3/15/07

March Madness, my favorite time of the sporting year, is upon us. The tournament started today, but I will belatedly present my pick region by region.

MIDWEST-Opening Round: Florida over Jackson State, Arizona over Purdue, Butler over Old Dominion, Maryland over Davidson, Winthrop over Notre Dame, Oregon over Miami (OH), Georgia Tech over UNLV, and Wisconsin over Texas A&M C-C. Second Round: Florida over Arizona, Maryland over Butler, Oregon over Winthrop, and Wisconsin over Georgia Tech. Sweet 16: Florida over Maryland, Oregon over Wisconsin. Elite 8: Florida over Oregon.

WEST-Opening Round: Kansas over Niagra, Villanova over Kentucky, Illinois over Virginia Tech, Southern Illinois over Holy Cross, Duke over VCU, Pittsburgh over Wright State, Gonzaga over Indiana, UCLA over Weber State. Second Round: Kansas over Villanova, Illinois over Southern Illinois, Pittsburgh over Duke, UCLA over Gonzaga. Sweet 16: Kansas over Illinois, UCLA over Pittsburgh. Elite 8: UCLA over Kansas.

EAST-Opening Round: North Carolina over Eastern Kentucky, Marquette over Michigan State, USC over Arkansas, Texas over New Mexico State, George Washington over Vanderbilt, Washington State over Oral Roberts, Boston College over Texas Tech, Georgetown over Belmont. Second Round: North Carolina over Marquette, USC over Texas, Washington State over George Washington, Georgetown over Boston College. Sweet 16: North Carolina over USC, Georgetown over Washington State. Elite 8: North Carolina over Georgetown.

SOUTH- Opening Round: Ohio State over Central Connecticut, BYU over Xavier, Tennessee over Long Beach State, Virginia over Albany, Louisville over Stanford, Texas A&M over Penn, Nevada over Creighton, Memphis over North Texas. Second Round: Ohio State over BYU, Tennessee over Virginia, Texas A&M over Louisville, Memphis over Nevada. Sweet 16: Ohio State over Tennessee, Texas A&M over Memphis. Elite 8: Ohio State over Texas A&M.

FINAL FOUR

UCLA over Florida, Ohio State over North Carolina

Ohio State

over UCLA

Most Outstanding Player:Mike Conley, Jr.

Sleeper from each region (6 seed or lower): Arizona (MW), Illinois (W), Boston College (E), Nevada (S). Players who will become household names: Aaron Brooks, Scotty Reynolds, D.J. Strawberry, Jeremy Pargo, Taj Gibson, Derrick Low, Jared Dudley.


The Bizniz, Volume 2, Issue 2 ARCHIVE

2/15/06

Former NBA player John Amaechi's recent announcement that he is gay has created significant headlines. Amaechi becomes the first NBA player to make such an announcement, joining Esera Tuaolo as the first and only openly gay former professional athletes of consequence. The reactions to Amaechi's announcement have been widely varied. The landscape of pro sports is very much in step with the stereotypes of masculinity and virility, even womanizing, among male stars. Sheryl Swoopes came out in 2004, breaking the barrier within women's sports. Most didn't seem greatly affected by Swoopes admission; for better or worse many people stereotype female athletes in an unflattering light in terms of sexuality, so it wasn't exactly a shocking revelation. But in Amaechi's case, much like Tuaolo, the male sports landscape is very different. Athletes like Shawn Kemp exhibit the extremes of the aforementioned male stereotype (depending on the source, apocryphal or not, Kemp has fathered anywhere from a few to numerous children with numerous women while playing in the NBA.) Homosexuality in general is looked at askance. In pro sports, homosexuality is simply unacceptable, at least in popular perception. I have no problem with Amaechi's sexual preference. In fact, such "admissions" shouldn't even be newsworthy. However, until society catches up with reality, that there are millions of homosexual people on the planet whether you like it or not, news fodder will still be had of the bedroom practices of its people. (As an aside, I am much more offended by Amaechi's openly laissez-faire attitude while playing in the NBA. That is, he openly said he had very little passion for the game and that it was simply a way to make money.) I am a deeply religious person and unfortunately the "religious right" has caused a broad stroke to be painted on us: that we all condemn gay people, that they are diseased and "need Jesus." I have a close family member who is gay. While I don't necessarily promote her lifestyle, for a number of reasons, religious and otherwise, I love her. I attended the commitment ceremony she and her partner had. Many of my family did not, citing the advice and/or dogma given by ecclesiastical leaders. The issue in not what is "right" or "wrong" in the eyes of society. The point is that the world is diverse and that these issues only serve to divide us as human beings. Today, another former NBA player, Tim Hardaway, commented on Amaechi's revelation. "I hate gay people…it [homosexuality] shouldn't be in the world," Hardaway said in a radio interview. These comments are shocking for several reasons. First, athletes usually show much more decorum in interviews, to the point that interviews are often robotic. Hardaway made mildly offensive remarks first, then was asked by the interviewer, Dan Le Batard, if he wanted to clarify his homophobic sounding remarks. Typically you would have expected Hardaway at that point to say something like, "no that's not what I meant" or "I'd rather not say anything else," thus preventing further damage. But Hardaway went on to drop the "hate" bombshell and made the situation much worse. Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, Hardaway is black. He played at the University of Texas-El Paso which was once known as Texas Western, the school made famous in the movie Glory Road. How can a black man, who has conceivably faced hatred and bigotry, or certainly has roots thereto, who attended the school that was the first to have an all-black lineup in an all-white world and who faced terrible bigotry, make such hateful remarks? What would Hardaway say if someone said "I hate black people, I don't think they have a place in the world"? The debate will rage on about whether or not homosexuality is a choice. Again, to me the issue isn't the science or theology involved. The issue is respect for your fellow man. Hardaway can hate people if he wants, but by saying what he said, and in no uncertain terms, he has put on gasoline boots for a stroll through hell. Maybe you do not like or condone homosexuality. Maybe you do or are gay yourself. Maybe you're a devout [xyz religion] and you cannot bring yourself to accept such sinful behavior. It does not matter. Surely any religion claiming such profound doctrine must also teach love, right? Again, I cannot fathom a minority saying he hates a member of a particular group. Don't get me wrong, you probably won't find me marching at a gay rights parade or fighting the cause tooth and nail. I find many gay people annoying, just like I find many straight people annoying. I think the idea of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is extremely pretentious. I do not have a rainbow bumper sticker. But the comments that Tim Hardaway made were completely offensive to me, just as I would be offended by a KKK meeting or satanic literature or the movie title and pervasive stereoptype White Men Can't Jump (a whole issue unto itself.) For every step we as society take forward, it sees we still take two steps back.

Quote of the Week:

"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority,
it is time to pause and reflect."
-- Mark Twain

The Bizniz, Volume 2, Issue 1 ARCHIVE

1/25/07

Wow, it was interesting to throw down "Volume 2" on the subject line. 2007 is upon us. As such, I feel the need to catch up on several topics, both in reflection and projection. Chronologically, I must discuss college football first. The vaunted Ohio State Buckeyes were annihilated by the Florida Gators in the BCS National Championship Game. The Buckeyes were such prohibitive favorites that they probably had the post game victory party planned and stocked and the busses warming (except that the game was in the desert of Glendale, AZ, I guess…) Ohio State (in)famously had over 50 days between their last regular season game (a win over rival Michigan) and the title game. How much impact did the layoff have? Hard to say but surely it didn't help the Buckeyes. In related news, USC struggled and lost to UCLA in the Rose Bowl then beat up on Michigan in The Rose Bowl. Boise State went

NFL Street
on us and pulled off the upset of Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl, finishing a "perfect" 13-0. [Note: I was a Boise Hater for most of the year, mostly due to their lackluster schedule. However, after the fashion in which they won in AZ, how can you not appreciate them? Not their blue turf at home, however. And start scheduling some people!] LSU looked close to unbeatable by season's end, including a thrashing of The University of College Football in America, Notre Dame. What's the point? Florida beat Ohio State straight up. Both finished with one loss, though. BSU was undefeated. USC and LSU looked like they could match up with anyone, despite two losses each. Thus springs to mind the anathema college presidents everywhere shudder to hear: A PLAYOFF. How amazing would it have been following the aforementioned games to see a Final Four of Boise State vs. USC and Florida vs. LSU (or some combination therein.) The funny thing is the reason that the powers that be do not want a playoff is perceived revenue losses from the bowl games. A playoff would bring in so much money it would be ridiculous. I'm not clamoring for a playoff as a fan so much as a business student who sees an incredible opportunity. A college football playoff flat out makes fiscal sense. (Ahh, who am I kidding, I want it as a fan!) Why make Ohio State wait around for two months to play? Oh, they would miss too much class during December during the playoffs. Those altruistic college presidents are only looking out for the student athlete, after all.

Next, I want to hit some NFL. My playoff bracket is in shambles (I had the Panthers vs. Patriots in Miami) but good football is always good football. Even going into Championship weekend, I liked the Pats and the Saints to advance. Indy always gets paranoid late in January and the Bears rely too much on pick-6's and kick returns. Alas, both squads won. So we see a Super Bowl XLI matchup of the Colts and Bears. Quite literally the irresistible force (Indy's offense) against the immovable object (Chicago's defense.) It should be a fascinating contrast. Now that Peyton Manning has slain the dragon of Tom Brady and New England I really think he'll finish the job. The Bears are fabulous defensively and on special teams but Rex Grossman is not the player I'd want behind center if the fate of the world rested on his success. I like Indy to win (yeah for Peyton!) 30-18. Additional NFL: The Oakland Raiders (the squad boasting the author's allegiance) own the #1 overall pick in April's Draft and just inked a new head coach, Lane Kiffen, the erstwhile USC offensive coordinator. At 31, Kiffen is very young and he doesn't have any head coaching experience at any level. I'm first relieved that the Raiders didn't bring in a retread coach like a Jim Fassell or a Denny Green (see: Norv Turner.) Secondly, I think Kiffen can bring in a youthful exuberance and innovation on the field, having engineered much of the Trojans' feared attack over the last few seasons. I'm hopeful what the guy can do (John Madden wasn't much older when he took over in Oakland. More recently, look at Eric Mangini in the Big Apple and Sean Payton in the Big Easy. Quick turnarounds can happen.) As for the first pick I have several possible scenarios I'd like to see. The popular sentiment seems to be that either JaMarcus Russell or Brady Quinn (likely Russell) is the homerun pick. I love Russell (see my college football preview blog if you think I'm a Johnny-come-lately) and I think he'll be a bona fide star in the league (for the record, I'm a little less enthused about Quinn. Did he ever win a big game?) Obviously a 2-14 team needs more than any one player can provide. Thusly, I think the Raiders should see what interest is out there for the #1. Perhaps they can add either impact vets or more picks, trade down, and pick up a quality player. I think there are franchise talents at several positions (QB, RB, WR, OT, DE, DB) so a later pick should still net a very good player. The Raiders finished with the league's 3rd rated D (#3 in the NFL!) so the entire draft should be offensive-minded. Oakland's incumbents are talented (Brooks/Walter, Jordan, Curry, etc.) and could succeed given better opportunities (i.e. pass protection, better run blocking.) Notice I didn't mention Randy Moss or Jerry Porter. I hope both are dealt. Ron Curry quietly had a money year. Maybe add Dwayne Jarrett to compliment him later in the top half of round one. Or Adrian Peterson, who is most generally projected later than 8. Build on the success of the defense (war Rob Ryan) and decide if Brooks or Walter can be the guy at QB. If not, go with Russell. But anybody's going to struggle if the Silver and Black continue to boast an offensive line that allows so much penetration it makes Paris Hilton seem prude. I'm envisioning a lineup next year of a confident Andrew Walter at QB, handing off to Adrian Peterson, and throwing to Curry and new TE Mike Williams (whom the Raiders acquired from Detroit for Jerry Porter, and whom they convinced to switch positions and battle Gates, Gonzalez, and Heap for a trip to Honolulu every Feb.) Nhamdi Asamugha (2nd team All-Pro) and company continue to make plays on D, and the Raiders challenge in the competitive AFC West. A guy can dream, can't he??

Quote of the Week:

"Ya cars and ya cash ain't everything, ya jewels and ya gems ain't everything, ya rims and ya Timbs ain't everything."-Human Family